_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|

|
Sep 8, 11:30 AM, Government Affairs @ BASCO
Sep13, 3:30 PM, Festival of Homes Committee Meeting, @ BASCO |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Remington Park: Spike Night |

back to top |
6:00 PM Friday
September 16, 2011
Remington Park Suite
Admission
FREE to Spikes with 6 or more credits
$20 for all others
(includes food, open bar, tip sheet
and racing forms)
RSVP Required:
Deadline September 9, 2011
REGISTER NOW - Click HERE
|
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Builder Guide to Appraisals: Obtaining Accurate Valuations on New Homes |

back to top |
Major changes have occurred in appraisal standards and practices in the wake of housing and financial market turmoil. These shiftsBuilder Partnerships present major challenges to home builders in financing and selling their homes. On Wednesday, August 4, 2:00 - 3:00 p.m., Eastern time a panel of home builder and appraisal practitioners will inform builders on the new appraisal rules and provide advice on what builders can do to improve the accuracy of home valuations.
The program will cover:
- Recent changes in appraisal standards and practices.
- Requirements for appraisals of new homes.
- Communications with lenders and appraisers.
- Key information to provide on subject properties.
- Tips for dealing with appraisals in distressed markets.
- Process for addressing appraisal errors and pursuing reconsideration of values.
For more information about this item, please contact Agustin Cruz at 800-368-5242 x8472 or via email at acruz@nahb.org
|
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
NAHB Economics Introduce New Economic Index to Track Improving Housing Markets
|

|
On Sept. 7, NAHB will unveil a new monthly economic indicator—the NAHB Improving Markets Index (IMI)—designed to track housing markets throughout the country that are showing signs of improving economic health. I will formally unveil the index during the Fall Board of Directors meeting.
Below is a description from NAHB Economics on the new Index:
The IMI is intended to draw attention to the fact that there are metropolitan areas where recovery is underway. The index measures three readily available monthly data series that are independently collected or calculated and are indicative of improving economic health.
The three indicators are employment growth (from BLS), house price growth (from Freddie Mac) and single family housing growth (from Census). Each metro area (out of roughly 360 defined MSAs) must see improvement in all three indicators at least six months after their respective troughs before being categorized as improving. The exact calculations are the product of:
the current three-month moving average in single family housing permits divided by the three-month moving average that ends with the trough in single family permits divided by the number of months since the trough (i.e., the average monthly change in the three-month moving average)
· the current number of jobs divided by the number of jobs at the trough
· the current price index divided by the index value at the trough
· If there has been no trough, then the value is zero
Results for the September Improving Markets Index - Twelve metropolitan areas made the list of improving markets for the first release of the index this month. Below is the list of those MSAs:
1. Bismarck, ND
2. Midland, TX
3. Alexandria, LA
4. Casper, WY
5. Pittsburgh, PA
6. Houma, LA
7. Bangor, ME
8. Anchorage, AK
9. New Orleans, LA
10. Waco, TX
11. Fairbanks, AK
12. Fayetteville, NC
Full tables and information related to the NAHB Improving Markets Index will be available at www.nahb.org/IMI beginning September 7. To sign up to receive NAHB’s press releases on this and other topics, please go to www.nahb.org/erelease.
|
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Refinancing “Stimulus” Is No Slam Dunk
|

|
The U.S. is caught up in "refi" madness.
Among the measures President Obama may unveil in his major policy speech this week is a plan to make mortgage refinancing easier, so more households can benefit from ultralow rates. Various proposals for this have been circulating for some time; last June, Morgan Stanley dubbed its version a "Slam-Dunk Stimulus."
But there is a catch. Many mortgage holders aren't able to refinance because they can't afford the fees, no longer qualify for a loan or their mortgage is more than the home is worth. As a result, refi activity has been fairly weak despite the 4.3% average rate for a 30-year, fixed-mortgage.
On Wednesday, the Mortgage Bankers Association will release its weekly mortgage application data; as of last week, its refi index was down 33% from the same period a year ago and even further below peak refi activity in 2003.
This despite the fact that more than three-quarters of borrowers with a mortgage backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac had a rate of 5% or more as of June, according to one recent policy proposal.
Hence the desire for government intervention. The hope is it could benefit as many as 30 million households and free up $20 billion to $70 billion a year by reducing interest payments, according to various proposals.
But that money isn't likely to provide much of a stimulus. For one, there is no guarantee it will be spent; balance-sheet impaired households may pay down debts or boost savings. And, even if people did spend every penny, even $70 billion would still amount to less than 0.5% of the nation's $15 trillion gross domestic product.
True, shoring up household finances has benefits.
"What we're doing is restructuring household balance sheets," says Columbia Business School Professor Chris Mayer, co-author of one policy proposal.
The quicker debt burdens can be lowered, the better for the economy's long-term health.
Such a program isn't without cost, though. Banks and other investors currently holding mortgage bonds would suffer. The taxpayer, through Fannie and Freddie, would also take an up-front hit. And, should any program also include debt forgiveness, there would be significant moral hazard.
While a mass refi program may offer some economic relief, it is certainly no cure-all. |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
No Consensus on Housing Woes Fix
|

|
President Barack Obama and Congress are confronting a historic obstacle in their efforts to revive the stalled economy: a crippled housing market unlikely to rebound for several years.
And unless that market snaps back, any new extraordinary stimulus package to create jobs would fail, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan concluded.
“Until we can do that, it’s very hard for me to see how we get the unemployment down to an acceptable level,” Greenspan told a Washington audience last month.
Not every economist agrees with his assessment, yet there’s recognition that the traditional mechanisms of supply and demand have largely broken down. But the scope of the problem is unlikely to be eased by federal and state lawsuits designed to extract billions of dollars in damages from the banks involved in subprime lending.
In a speech last week that analyzed turning foreclosed homes into rental properties and other solutions, Fed governor
Elizabeth Duke acknowledged the “market is not functioning as it should.”
“We, as a nation, currently have a housing market that is so severely out of balance that it is hampering our economic recovery,” she said. “Solutions aimed at righting the wrongs of previous reckless lending in the subprime market are not sufficient to tackle the scale of current problems.”
Lately, some administration officials have anonymously floated a plan to let mortgage holders refinance at lower rates, which would be in addition to an existing program that has helped more than 790,000 delinquent borrowers modify their home loans.
“It’s not the difference between a 4 percent and 6 percent interest that’s causing people to go into foreclosure,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist for real estate services firm Zillow. “Unfortunately, the market is going to have to heal itself on that front.”
Fed policy has pushed mortgage interest rates to an astoundingly low 4.22 percent. But a stream of buyers has yet to materialize — even as nationwide prices have collapsed to 2003 levels, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Indices.
In short, several economists suggest plunging home prices have fed a vicious cycle: Stuck with less valuable homes, families have pulled back spending. And that, in turn, has stunted hiring, which prevents people from buying homes.
A typical consumer spent almost $100 a day three years ago, according to the pollster Gallup. Now, such spending hovers around $68.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief economist Martin Regalia said an increase in consumer spending depends on a housing recovery.
“We’ve lost a ton of net worth, and where we have to make that back is in the assets where we lost it,” he said. “There’s no other asset that’s going to step up and take over for the house, the home, in the average American portfolio.”
Unlike previous recoveries going back several decades, the financial crisis triggered in 2008 by the implosion of the housing bubble indicates the government cannot solely engineer a recovery through real estate, said David Crowe, chief economist at the National Association of Home Builders.
“Government can do some good,” he suggested, “but time and an improving economy will be the primary solution.”
While foreclosures have produced a glut of housing, Crowe explained that demand is also a major part of the problem. The downturn has prevented the formation of about 2 million new households over the past four years, he said.
People “stayed with roommates or their parents because they didn’t have the money to live independently,” Crowe said. “If that began to release, you would absorb the excess inventory and the pace of foreclosures wouldn’t be the focus that it is.”
Humphries expects the housing market to hit its trough sometime from 2014 to 2016, though he cautioned his estimate is based on “middling” job projections that now seem hopeful with unemployment stalled above 9 percent.
The housing recovery would not resemble a V-shape, where prices shoot back up, Humphries said. Instead, it would look like an L-shape with prices fluttering around the bottom for some time.
“It’s not getting back to the go-go years where you’re seeing appreciation of 5 [percent] to 10 percent a year,” he predicted.
The interconnection of housing, consumer spending and employment complicates attempts to revive the economy on an electoral timeline.
Regalia said the best government policy would involve allowing a painful but cathartic chain of foreclosures to proceed so the market can bottom out.
There are 10.9 million borrowers with homes worth less than their mortgages, according to Treasury Department records.
The current pace of foreclosure filings — about 212,000 in July — has only delayed an inevitable and painful reckoning, Regalia said.
“Negative equity situations are almost impossible to address without somebody taking a loss,” he explained. “The government has to take a loss to make good on these things, in which case we add to the deficit significantly. Or the individuals that hold those loans, namely the banking system, will take the loss.”
“Nobody is anxious to take a loss,” he added, “so everybody kind of drags their feet.” |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Global Finance: What Did Annie, Freddie Know |

back to top |
The 17 lawsuits filed Friday by federal regulators against some of the world's biggest financial
institutions hinge on a simple premise: The mortgage loans that banks packaged into securities often
didn't meet the underwriting guidelines the banks outlined in their securities filings.
The lawsuits, filed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, allege that the banks made untrue
statements and omitted key facts when they sold mortgage investments to loan giants Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac.
The suits involve $196 billion in mortgage bonds packaged by some of the world's biggest banks. In
addition to the banks, the suits name more than 100 executives who signed offering statements for the
securities. Several of the named banks denied the allegations, didn't respond to requests for comment
or declined to comment.
The FHFA didn't specify how much it is seeking in damages.
Fannie and Freddie don't make loans directly, but they support housing markets by buying mortgages
from banks and then selling them to investors as securities, providing guarantees to investors.
During the housing boom, the two companies augmented their role in the housing market by purchasing
privately issued mortgage securities as investments.
It is those investments at issue in the suits. Analysts said the cases could ultimately turn on whether the
FHFA can show that Fannie and Freddie, given all their expertise in evaluating mortgage risks, were
misled about the quality of the loans backing those investments.
Citing detailed loan information, the FHFA lawsuits allege that the banks repeatedly misrepresented or
made untrue statements about basic characteristics of loans in the securities, such as the portion of
borrowers who lived in their homes and the percentage of the property's value being financed.
Banks "routinely" packaged loans into securities even though they had been flagged by third‐party due
diligence firms as not meeting underwriting guidelines, according to the lawsuits.
"It's a great myth that you can't defraud sophisticated financial parties," said William K. Black, a former
bank regulator involved with hundreds of successful savings‐and‐loan‐era prosecutions. "Models cannot
protect you against fraudulent loans" or inadequate disclosures.
The FHFA's review of a sample of loans in one Goldman Sachs Group Inc. bond deal cited in a lawsuit
found that the portion of properties that appeared not to be owner‐occupied was nearly double the
amount stated in the prospectus supplement.
Goldman Sachs declined to comment.
The banks are likely to argue that Fannie and Freddie knew that the loans were risky and that losses
were due to underlying economic conditions, not faulty underwriting. "It will become clear that the
plaintiffs knew as much as the defendants about the quality of these loan portfolios," says Andrew
Sandler, co‐chairman of BuckleySandler LLP, a law firm representing banks in litigation and regulatory
enforcement actions.
Roughly a dozen investors and government agencies, including at least five federal home loan banks,
American International Group Inc. and the National Credit Union Administration, have filed similar
lawsuits
Both the FHFA and NCUA have an edge over some other plaintiffs because they have subpoena power
that has provided them with access to loan files.
|
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
MEMBER ADVANTAGE

back to top |
As a member of the National Association of Home Builders you will receive an additional 20% off the “Best Available Rate” at participating locations every time you travel wiht the Wyndham Hotel Group.
Give agent your special NAHB discount ID number 20090 at time of booking to receive discount, or use the direct links below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Whether you are looking for an upscale hotel, an all-inclusive resort or something more cost-effective, we have the right hotel for you… and at the right price. So start saving now.
Call our special member benefits hotline 1-877-670-7088 or click on one of the links below to reserve your room today at one of these fine hotels:
- Wyndham Hotels and Resorts®
- Wingate By Wyndham®
- Hawthorn Suites®
- Ramada Worldwide®
- Days Inn®
Super 8®
- Baymont Inns and Suites®
- Microtel Inns and Suites®
- Howard Johnson®
- Travelodge®
Knights Inn®
“Best Available Rate” is defined as the best, non-qualified, publicly available rate on the Internet for the hotel, date and accommodations requested. Certain restrictions apply. To redeem this offer, call 1-877-670-7088 or visit the links above and give ID 20090 at the time of reservation. Offer not valid if hotel is called directly, caller must use toll free numbers listed above. Advanced reservations are required. Offer is subject to availability at participating locations and some blackout dates may apply. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, offers, or special promotions. Discounts vary by location and time of year. Offer is void where prohibited by law and has no cash value.
For more information about this item, please contact Christy Ronaldson at 800-368-5242 x8273 or via email at cronaldson@nahb.org. |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Oklahoma Green Building Summit
|

|
Sept. 27-28, 2011
Reed Center, Midwest City
Sooner Rd & I-40
Registration is now open for the 3rd Annual Green Building Summit! Back by popular demand is nationally renowned speaker Joe Lstiburek. Joe is well recognized as an expert in building science.
This is your opportunity to come and learn about the science behind the "green" phenomena. There is also opportunity to visit with peers and other experts about best practices - what works, what doesn't.
Keynote Speaker:
Joseph Lstiburek
Day 1: Residential Building
Day 2: Commercial Building
COST:
1 day $50,
Both days $75
Register now at okgreenbuildingsummit.com
Applying for Continuing
Education for Realtors
Architects / Appraisers
Professional Engineers
Master Builders

|
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|

back to top
|
BASCO has a new recruiting incentive for EVERYONE!
Recruit a NEW member and BASCO will give YOU $100!!
Click here for membership application and membership benefits
RECRUIT FOR CASH!!!!
|
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Need Help with Your Member Dues? |
|
Your membership dues can now be broken down into three monthly payments.
Contact the BASCO Office to set up your monthly payments. 360-4161 |
|